Author Archive
Is Citigroup (NYSE:C) Better Than a $4 Stock?
Posted by: | CommentsEven though Citigroup (NYSE:C) and others with vested interest in them would like to believe they’re better than a $4 stock, I don’t think at this time that is the case, and in the short term it is doubtful they’ll have much support beyond that.
We could and probably will see them make occasionally upward spurts, but they’re sure to come crashing back down soon afterwards.
It seem everyone has been trying to create the idea Citigroup is ready for a big run, with some analysts upgrading the stock and hedge funds showing some interest.
As I mentioned in my last post, as far as hedge funds and speculators, they’re interested in Citigroup for the exact opposite reasons analysts and investors are: because they aren’t in that great of shape, or at least are totally unpredictable in the short term.
That’s why hedge funds in particular have been buying up shares, as the price of the stock is experiencing the type of movement that those who like to make quick money in love to see.
Speculators and traders are among those who like to see the same thing, and a stock that moves up and down on just about every piece of news about them, or even more accurately, has a lot of stories being written about them, is the dream stock for those who know how to take advantage of volatility.
So even though there are some positive signs for Citigroup, like the government selling their stake in them, divesting of non-core assets, among other strategies, there is a long way to go before Citigroup could be called a sustainable company, and one which can be reasonably projected forward as to its performance over a period of time.
Of course in reference to the Treasury selling their stake, in the near term that’s a positive and a negative. It’s a positive for the reason government having a hand in the company, but a negative in that it can depress the shares of the company because so many are out there in the market.
Some analysts believe Citigroup is undervalued, but if they are, over time that will eventually be revealed by an increase in the share price of the stock, which could be lagging.
Either way, in the near future it’s doubtful Citigroup will break out in any way much beyond the $4 a share mark.
Stripping it down to the basics, there’s simply no real reason or reasons they should or could at this time.
This article (Is Citigroup (NYSE:C) Better Than a $4 Stock?) was originally developed by and is property of American Banking News. Checkout American Banking News for up-to-date banking news and peer to peer lending news.
Bill Ackman Acquires Citigroup 150 Million Citigroup (NYSE:C) Shares
Posted by: | CommentsBill Ackman is a well-known activist investor, and manages Pershing Square Capital Management, a large hedge fund, announced yesterday at a conference that he has acquired about 150 million shares of Citigroup (NYSE:C) over the last several weeks.
Citigroup is an ideal stock for speculators, traders and hedge funds, as the inherent volatility in the stock makes it perfect for those who like to have large swings in share price to bet against, which Citigroup will experience for several years at minimum.
This is one of the reasons why Citigroup shares are all over the place, as they move up and down with those moving in and out of the stock to acquire and sell positions.
There is little certainty with Citigroup in the short term, and until their fundamentals are sound, we’ll see this type of activity from hedge fund managers like Bill Ackman, who thrive in volatile situations as those connected to Citigroup.
Other large financial institutions like Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) and Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS) like these types of circumstances, especially Goldman Sachs, who may the best in the world at generating revenue and profits in the midst of volatility.
So when you hear hedge funds and trading units of companies buying up Citigroup, it’s not because they’re investing in a company they believe in, it’s because they are so weak and unstable, which adds to the already enhanced circumstances surrounding the company.
This doesn’t mean Citigroup isn’t improving some as they divest of non-core assets and eventually emerge from government control, but it does mean in the near term, as measured probably in a couple of years, they’re going to have a wild ride, and at the price their shares are at, just a small movement of their share price will generate significant gains or losses.
In other words, Citigroup is the type of playground these types of money managers and speculators thrive in, and that level of opportunity doesn’t come along every day for them.
This article (Bill Ackman Acquires Citigroup 150 Million Citigroup (NYSE:C) Shares) was originally developed by and is property of American Banking News. Checkout American Banking News for up-to-date banking news and peer to peer lending news.
A report from the Wall Street Journal states that based on data gathered from the Federal Reserve, Citigroup (NYSE:C), Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) and Deutsche Bank (NYSE:DB) are the worst offenders for removing debt from their books just before they report their quarterly earnings.
Citigroup and the Federal Reserve had no comment on the story, while Bank of America said this to the Wall Street Journal:
“From time to time, the size of our balance sheet will fluctuate due to market liquidity, client financing needs, the company’s risk appetite and balance-sheet-management functions.”
Deutsche Bank said to the financial newspaper, that Deutsche Bank told the newspaper that repos are “just one aspect of our liability-management program” and that the bank “regularly adjusts the mix of its secured and unsecured short-term borrowing to optimize its funding.”
At this time the reason the banks and market in general shrugged off the revelation is that the practice is nothing new, and smart investors always take with a grain of salt the numbers put up by any company in their quarterly reports.
What makes this different and a story worthy of more consideration, is the banks slashed their net borrowings by 41 percent when averaged out, buy going to the repo market, according to the Journal.
The current economic weakness also changes the narrative, and banks that continue these practices at the levels some of them are doing, provide a story that isn’t a real one, and one based on creative accounting to make them look much more sound than they really are.
Again, this is standard industry practice for many public firms, but in times like these, financial institutions reporting they are much more healthy than they really are is a danger to not only those investing in them, but to those making decisions in other areas based on assumptions the giant banks are safe now.
Just on Monday, Weiss Ratings came out with similar concerns, saying the failure rate of banks could rise even further than expected, based on the numbers which say they aren’t near as healthy as they let on.
What repo rates entail are the borrowing of short-term funds in order to make larger trades, using securities as collateral. Failed trades can devastate a company making the wrong moves, and investors and shareholders may not be able to see it in the number in order to prepare for it.
This article (Citigroup (NYSE:C), Bank of America (NYSE:BAC), Deutsche Bank (NYSE:DB) Worst at Removing Debt Off Books) was originally developed by and is property of American Banking News. Checkout American Banking News for up-to-date banking news and peer to peer lending news.