Archive for Goldman Sachs

Aug
15

Wells Fargo chairman is America’s highest paid banker

Posted by: admin | Comments Comments Off

Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article was written by Andrew Clark, New York, for guardian.co.uk on Tuesday 16th February 2010 18.27 UTC

A former Minnesota farm boy who began his working life as a baker has become America’s highest-paid banking boss by taking a sceptical view of Wall Street’s trading floors and scorning the financial industry’s penchant for exotic derivatives.

John Stumpf, a low-key conservative figure who is chairman of San Francisco-based Wells Fargo, is shown to have earned $18.7m (£11.8m) after executive pay disclosures by the top US banks. He edged out JP Morgan’s Jamie Dimon, who earned $17.6m last year, and was paid twice as much as Goldman Sachs boss Lloyd Blankfein, who exercised “restraint” by taking a bonus of just $9m.

Wells Fargo has emerged from the financial crisis as a significant national player, with profits of $12.3bn for 2009, by a plain vanilla approach of concentrating on high-street and commercial banking rather than playing the capital markets on Wall Street. In a deal widely viewed as a shrewd manoeuvre, Wells muscled out Citigroup to buy the assets of struggling North Carolina-based Wachovia for $12.7bn at the end of 2008, giving it a coast-to-coast presence to make it a national heavyweight.

“Wells Fargo has benefited because its management, historically, was not enamoured with the capital markets business – its strength was more in commercial and retail banking,” said Fred Cannon, a banking analyst at broker Keefe Bruyette and Woods, who names Wells Fargo and JP Morgan as the strongest players of the credit crunch. “They were very big in the mortgage business but they avoided some of the more aggressive mortgage products,” Cannon added.

With 10,000 branches and 279,000 employees, Wells Fargo ranks as America’s fourth largest bank in terms of its assets which are worth $1.2 trillion. Founded in 1852, it originally served San Francisco’s gold miners and until the 1980s, its network was limited to California. It became a significant player through a merger with Minneapolis-based Norwest in 1998 and the purchase of Wachovia has expanded its presence in the eastern states of the US.

Stumpf’s personal pay package is asharp increase on his $9m earnings a year ago and his remuneration of $11.5m before the credit crunch began in 2007. In common with most US banks, Wells Fargo is paying its executives largely in shares – Stumpf gets a $900,000 salary plus about $17.5m in shares vesting over the course of three years.

One of 11 siblings from a dairy farm in the tiny Minnesota town of Pierz, the 56-year-old can claim a rags-to-riches story. In a 2007 address to students at his alma mater, St Cloud University, he revealed that he shared a bed with two siblings as a child because the family had only three beds between seven brothers.

Stumpf’s first job was at a local bakery and after graduating with a finance degree, he worked as a repossession agent for a local bank, First Bank Systems. He became chief executive in 2007, replacing veteran Richard Kovacevich. He been with Wells Fargo for 27 years. And he has a colourful side – at company dos, he has dressed as Elton John, John Lennon and the long-haired teenage hero of the movie Wayne’s World to entertain staff.

Until its purchase of Wachovia gave it a significantly sized brokerage, Wells Fargo had only a limited presence on Wall Street.

In a newspaper interview last year, Stumpf said: “We like serving customers, and that’s distinguished from doing some structured product that doesn’t involve customers and some exotic proprietary investing where you invest for your own book. I’m not wild about that.”

Wells Fargo also argues that it avoided the worst temptations of predatory mortgage lending at the height of the housing boom, while its competitors were over-egging the housing market by pumping out unrealistic home loans. Its record, however, is hardly snow white.

In December, the city of Memphis sued Wells Fargo for targeting ethnic minorities in deprived areas with predatory lending, accusing Wells in a lawsuit of “unlawful, irresponsible, unfair, deceptive and discriminatory mortgage lending practices”. The bank denied the charge as “baseless and inaccurate” and a similar lawsuit in Baltimore was thrown out by a federal judge last month.

Matthew Lee, founder of watchdog Fair Finance Watch, says that although Wells Fargo was not involved in packaging toxic mortgage-backed securities on the capital markets, it did its fair share of risky lending on the high street, shrewdly passing the loans on to third parties.

“They were as big in sub-prime as some of the others were but they weren’t left holding the baby when the music stopped,” said Lee.

Others at the top of this year’s banking pay list were in similarly retail-orientated firms. Third best paid was the boss of Visa, Joseph Saunders, with $15.5m while Mastercard’s president, Ajay Banga, got $13.5m. Large as these numbers may seem, they pale in comparison to the runaway banking paydays prior to the credit crunch, when Goldman Sachs’ chief earned a record $69m.

Stumpf has offered no comment on his position at the top of the industry’s pay tree, although Wells Fargo justified his share awards when they were granted by saying talented staff were being “increasingly and aggressively recruited by competitors”. In a somewhat off-beat reference to his own wealth back in 2007, Stumpf joked to students at his old university: “Money does not matter. I know a lot of people who are worth $20m and they are no happier than those who make $19m.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media Limited 2010

This article (Wells Fargo chairman is America’s highest paid banker) was originally developed by and is property of American Banking News. Checkout American Banking News for up-to-date banking news and peer to peer lending news.



Comments Comments Off

Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article was written by Andrew Clark, for guardian.co.uk on Monday 1st March 2010 20.24 UTC

They’re not all overpaid. One Wall Street banking boss, Citigroup’s chief executive Vikram Pandit, has embraced austerity by turning down a bonus and receiving a modest $128,750 in remuneration for 2009.

While still an eminently survivable wage, Pandit’s package amounted to a sharp pay cut by any terms. His compensation was down 99.7% on his 2008 haul of $38.2m. Back then, much of his pay was made up of share awards that have since sunk in value.

His drop in income, of course, reflects that fact that Citigroup had an abominable financial crisis. Citi was up to its neck in subprime homeloans and mortgage-related securities. The bank only survived with the help of $45bn from American taxpayers.

Citi lost $1.6bn during 2009 but has staggered back onto its feet and recently raised sufficient funds to repay the public. Pandit, 52, can’t be blamed for the entirety of Citi’s difficulties – he took the top job in December 2007, replacing Chuck Prince who was dumped when the board realised just how much trouble the bank was in.

Pandit pledged early last year to work for just $1 annually until the firm was back making sustainable profits. It seems that he made that promise after receiving his salary for 2009.

He earned far less than one of his own top traders, John Havens, who trousered $11m for the year. And considerable less than chief execs at rival banks such as Goldman Sachs’ Lloyd Blankfein, who got $9m, JP Morgan’s Jamie Dimon, who took home $17m and Wells Fargo’s John Stumpf who topped the table with $18m.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media Limited 2010

This article (CItigroup’s Pandit dons the hair shirt as Wall Street’s lowest paid bank chief) was originally developed by and is property of American Banking News. Checkout American Banking News for up-to-date banking news and peer to peer lending news.



Categories : Goldman Sachs
Comments Comments Off

Posted To: MBS Commentary

Stock futures are lower and interest rates are rallying after several key earnings releases failed to impress the markets. Investing pessimism began to spread in after hours trading last night after IBM and Texas Instruments reported lower than expected top line revenue growth. Equity futures moved even lower this morning after Goldman Sachs said Q2 earnings fell to $453 million ($0.78/share) compared to $2.7 billion ($4.93/share) in the same period of 2009. Although Goldman's earnings reflect a $550 million SEC fine and a $600 million expense related to U.K payroll taxes on bonuses, GS said client activity had declined across all business channels. Plain and Simple: the market is no longer satisfied with bottom line earnings per share growth, cost cutting, a steep yield curve, inventory…(read more)

Forward this article via email:  Send a copy of this story to someone you know that may want to read it.

Categories : Goldman Sachs
Comments Comments Off